|
''ラテン語:XII Panegyrici Latini'' or ''Twelve Latin Panegyrics'' is the conventional title of a collection of twelve ancient Roman panegyric orations. The authors of most of the speeches in the collection are anonymous, but appear to have been Gallic in origin. Aside from the first panegyric, composed by Pliny the Younger in 100, the other speeches in the collection date to between 289 and 389 and were probably composed in Gaul.〔Nixon and Rodgers, 4.〕 The original manuscript, discovered in 1433, has perished; only copies remain.〔Nixon and Rodgers, 3–4.〕 == Background == Gaul had a long history as a center of rhetoric. It maintained its dominance of the field well into the 4th century.〔T.J. Haarhoff, ''Schools of Gaul'' (London, 1920; rept. Johannesburg, 1958), ''passim'', cited in Nixon and Rodgers, 7.〕 An early lead in the field was taken by the Aedui, early allies of Rome and eager to assimilate to the ways of their new rulers: Maenian schools were celebrated as early as the reign of Tiberius ( 14–37).〔Tacitus, ''Annals'' 3.43, cited in Nixon and Rodgers, 7.〕 They continued to flourish into the days of Eumenius' grandfather, but were closed by the mid-3rd century.〔''Pan''. 9.17.2–3, cited in Nixon and Rodgers, 8.〕 There was some revival in the city in the late 3rd century, but after the establishment of Trier as an imperial capital in the 280s, the orators began feeling jealousy for the imperial patronage enjoyed by the citizens of Trier.〔Nixon and Rodgers, 8.〕 Despite the political and economic hegemony of the city, however, Trier failed to make any significant mark on the rhetoric of the period.〔Haarhoff, ''Schools of Gaul'', 48, cited in Nixon and Rodgers, 8.〕 Nixon and Rodgers suggest that it was simply too close to the imperial court.〔 The surviving evidence (which might be prejudiced by Ausonius' ''Professors of Bordeaux'') points to a shift from Autun and Trier as centers of the art in the Tetrarchic and Constantinian period, moving to Bordeaux later in the 4th century.〔Haarhoff, ''Schools of Gaul'', 46–48, cited in Nixon and Rodgers, 8; Nixon and Rodgers, 7–8.〕 The panegyrics evince a familiarity with prior handbooks of rhetoric. Some have argued that Menander of Laodicea's treatises were particularly influential on the collection, and believed his precepts were used in the tenth panegyric.〔 Cited in Nixon and Rodgers, 10–12.〕 However, because so much of Menander's advice consisted of standard rhetorical procedure, the parallels adduced in favor of Menander as a model are insufficient to prove his direct use by the panegyrists. Other handbooks of rhetoric might also have had influence on the collection. Quintilian's ''Institutio Oratoria'', for example, treats the subject of an oration's ancestry, parentage, and country in a manner similar to the panegyrics of 289, 291, 297, 310, 311, 321, and 389.〔Quintilian, ''Institutio Oratoria'' 3.7.10ff; Galletier I: xxxi, cited in Nixon and Rodgers, 12–13.〕 In any case, the other panegyrics in the collection vary widely from Menander's schema.〔Nixon and Rodgers, 12.〕 Parallels with other Latin orators, like Cicero and Pliny the Younger, are less frequent than they would have been if those authors had served as stylistic models.〔E. Vereecke, "Le Corpus des Panégyriques latins de l'époque tardive," ''Antiquité classique'' 44 (1975): 151–53, cited in Nixon and Rodgers, 13.〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Panegyrici Latini」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|